Evidence for γ-ray emission from the remnant of Kepler’s supernova based on deep H.E.S.S. observations

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 662 (2022) A65-A65

Authors:

F Aharonian, F Ait Benkhali, EO Angüner, H Ashkar, M Backes, V Barbosa Martins, R Batzofin, Y Becherini, D Berge, K Bernlöhr, M Böttcher, C Boisson, J Bolmont, M de Bony de Lavergne, M Breuhaus, R Brose, F Brun, T Bulik, T Bylund, F Cangemi, S Caroff, S Casanova, M Cerruti, T Chand, A Chen, G Cotter

Abstract:

Observations with imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes (IACTs) have enhanced our knowledge of nearby supernova (SN) remnants with ages younger than 500 yr by establishing Cassiopeia A and the remnant of Tycho’s SN as very-high-energy (VHE) γ -ray sources. The remnant of Kepler’s SN, which is the product of the most recent naked-eye SN in our Galaxy, is comparable in age to the other two, but is significantly more distant. If the γ -ray luminosities of the remnants of Tycho’s and Kepler’s SNe are similar, then the latter is expected to be one of the faintest γ -ray sources within reach of the current generation IACT arrays. Here we report evidence at a statistical level of 4.6 σ for a VHE signal from the remnant of Kepler’s SN based on deep observations by the High Energy Stereoscopic System (H.E.S.S.) with an exposure of 152 h. The measured integral flux above an energy of 226 GeV is ∼0.3% of the flux of the Crab Nebula. The spectral energy distribution (SED) reveals a γ -ray emitting component connecting the VHE emission observed with H.E.S.S. to the emission observed at GeV energies with Fermi -LAT. The overall SED is similar to that of the remnant of Tycho’s SN, possibly indicating the same nonthermal emission processes acting in both these young remnants of thermonuclear SNe.

Long-term rotational and emission variability of 17 radio pulsars

(2022)

Authors:

B Shaw, BW Stappers, P Weltevrede, PR Brook, A Karastergiou, CA Jordan, MJ Keith, M Kramer, AG Lyne

Radio Galaxy Zoo: Using semi-supervised learning to leverage large unlabelled data-sets for radio galaxy classification under data-set shift

ArXiv 2204.08816 (2022)

Authors:

Inigo V Slijepcevic, Anna MM Scaife, Mike Walmsley, Micah Bowles, Ivy Wong, Stanislav S Shabala, Hongming Tang

The science case and challenges of space-borne sub-millimeter interferometry

(2022)

Authors:

Leonid I Gurvits, Zsolt Paragi, Ricardo I Amils, Ilse van Bemmel, Paul Boven, Viviana Casasola, John Conway, Jordy Davelaar, M Carmen Díez-González, Heino Falcke, Rob Fender, Sándor Frey, Christian M Fromm, Juan D Gallego-Puyol, Cristina García-Miró, Michael A Garrett, Marcello Giroletti, Ciriaco Goddi, José L Gómez, Jeffrey van der Gucht, José Carlos Guirado, Zoltán Haiman, Frank Helmich, Ben Hudson, Elizabeth Humphreys, Violette Impellizzeri, Michael Janssen, Michael D Johnson, Yuri Y Kovalev, Michael Kramer, Michael Lindqvist, Hendrik Linz, Elisabetta Liuzzo, Andrei P Lobanov, Isaac López-Fernández, Inmaculada Malo-Gómez, Kunal Masania, Yosuke Mizuno, Alexander V Plavin, Raj T Rajan, Luciano Rezzolla, Freek Roelofs, Eduardo Ros, Kazi LJ Rygl, Tuomas Savolainen, Karl Schuster, Tiziana Venturi, Marjolein Verkouter, Pablo de Vicente, Pieter NAM Visser, Martina C Wiedner, Maciek Wielgus, Kaj Wiik, J Anton Zensus

Hybrid photometric redshifts for sources in the COSMOS and XMM-LSS fields

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 513:3 (2022) 3719-3733

Authors:

Pw Hatfield, Mj Jarvis, N Adams, Raa Bowler, B Häußler, Kj Duncan

Abstract:

In this paper we present photometric redshifts for 2.7 million galaxies in the XMM-LSS and COSMOS fields, both with rich optical and near-infrared data from VISTA and HyperSuprimeCam. Both template fitting (using galaxy and Active Galactic Nuclei templates within LePhare) and machine learning (using GPz) methods are run on the aperture photometry of sources selected in the Ks-band. The resulting predictions are then combined using a Hierarchical Bayesian model, to produce consensus photometric redshift point estimates and probability distribution functions that outperform each method individually. Our point estimates have a root mean square error of ∼0.08 − 0.09, and an outlier fraction of ∼3 − 4 percent when compared to spectroscopic redshifts. We also compare our results to the COSMOS2020 photometric redshifts, which contains fewer sources, but had access to a larger number of bands and greater wavelength coverage, finding that comparable photo-z quality can be achieved (for bright and intermediate luminosity sources where a direct comparison can be made). Our resulting redshifts represent the most accurate set of photometric redshifts (for a catalogue this large) for these deep multi-square degree multi-wavelength fields to date.