Thermal Surface Measurements of Europa using Galileo PPR: Searching for Temperature Anomalies

Copernicus Publications (2025)

Authors:

Sarah Howes, Carly Howett

Abstract:

. IntroductionPerhaps one of the most fascinating ice-covered moons in our solar system is the Galilean satellite Europa. The successful launch of Europa Clipper has motivated the re-evaluation of our current knowledge of the Jovian moon -- specifically thermal measurements of the moon's surface, which may contain information about recent geologic activity. After the discovery of active plumes on Enceladus [1], similar phenomena were searched for on Europa [2]. While evidence of surface alteration -- such as troughs, ridges, chaos terrain, and the lack of prevalent craters -- indicate ongoing activity and a relatively young surface [3], the presence of plumes is still being debated. While no endogenic thermal anomalies have yet been observed on Europa's surface [4], we re-assess the thermal IR data from Galileo Orbiter's photopolarimeter-radiometer instrument (PPR) [5]. We perform a thermal analysis of the surface properties of Europa, including mapping the thermal inertia and albedo similar to what was done by Rathbun et al. [4], with a goal of extending thermal surface mapping beyond the previous 20% surface coverage. We also perform a sensitivity study of PPR in hotspot detection by determining the minimum detectable hotspot temperature across the surface of the moon and compare our results to previous work. 2. Data AnalysisWe use 29 PPR radiometry datasets taken during various orbits ranging from November 1996 to November 1999. Both narrow band and open filters were used, with a total wavelength range of 0.3-110 μm. We divide the surface into 3°x3° longitude/latitude grid cells and determine each cell's temperature at a given local time to produce diurnal temperature curves. To determine the thermal inertia and albedo, we fit a thermophysical model to each cell's diurnal curve using the Thermophysical Body Model Simulation Script (TEMPEST) [6] as our modelling tool. The best-fit diurnal curve is chosen by minimizing the reduced chi-squared of the model fit, while all data with χred2

Update on NASA’s New Horizons Mission: Kuiper Belt Science Results and Future Plans

Copernicus Publications (2025)

Authors:

Kelsi Singer, Alan Stern, Anne Verbiscer, Simon Porter, William Grundy, Susan Bennechi, Marc Buie, Mihaly Horanyi, Alex Doner, Thomas Corbett, Andrew Poppe, Samantha Hasler, Laura Mayorga, Carly Howett, Wesley Fraser, Jj Kavelars, Fumi Yoshida, Takashi Ito, Ivy Knudsen, Pontus Brandt

Abstract:

NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft continues to explore the Kuiper belt after its historic close flybys of the Pluto system in 2015 at ~33 astronomical units (AU) [1] and the cold classical Kuiper belt object (KBO) Arrokoth in 2019 at ~43 AU [2].  New Horizons is located at ~61.7 AU as of this writing in May 2025, and travels about 3 AU per year.  New Horizons has sufficient power, propellant, and communications capability to continue operations until the mid-to-late 2040s and, thus, should be able to collect data out to distances of ~120 AU or greater. In its extended mission, New Horizons’ main planetary science focus is studying Kuiper belt dwarf planets and small KBOs, and their environment.  We will provide an overview of results for the dwarf planets and smaller KBOs observed by New Horizons from a distance ([3-6]; also see Porter et al., 2025 abstract at this conference).  New Horizons can observe KBOs from much higher phase angles than possible from Earth, and some of the observed KBOs come as close as 0.1 AU to the spacecraft.  This allows for the study of shapes, poles, surface properties, and  searches for close satellites in some cases.  New Horizons also made high-phase, color observations of the ice giants Uranus and Neptune [7] in coordination with the Hubble Space Telescope and as an exoplanet observation analogue.  Further, the New Horizons Student Dust Counter continues to observe elevated dust fluxes at larger distances than expected, and the team is exploring possible explanations for why the dust flux has not yet started to decrease as predicted by previous models [8, 9].  We will also highlight some new products and findings related to Arrokoth, including a new shape model [10], images draped onto the shape model, and a study placing Arrokoth’s crater size-frequency distribution into the context of those on other small bodies [11].  Looking towards the future of New Horizons: We will provide a status update on the ground-based, Subaru Telescope search [12-14] for a future close flyby target and other KBOs that New Horizons could observe as point sources.  We will also discuss how future work would enhance the chances of finding a future flyby target for New Horizons, including the additional use of machine learning/artificial intelligence, supercomputing, and potential observations from the Vera Rubin Observatory (also see Kavelaars et al. 2025 abstract in this conference) or the Roman Space Telescope.References:[1]  Stern S. A. et al., 2015, The Pluto system: Initial results from its exploration by New Horizons, Science 350, id.aad1815. doi:10.1126/science.aad1815[2]  Stern S. A. et al., 2019, Initial results from the New Horizons exploration of 2014 MU69, a small Kuiper Belt object, Science 364. doi:10.1126/science.aaw9771[3]  Verbiscer A. J. et al., 2024, The New Horizons Photometric Phase Angle Survey of Deep Outer Solar System Objects: From the Kuiper Belt to the Scattered Disk, 55th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 3040, 2531.[4]  Verbiscer A. J. et al., 2022, The Diverse Shapes of Dwarf Planet and Large KBO Phase Curves Observed from New Horizons, The Planetary Science Journal 3, 95. doi:10.3847/PSJ/ac63a6[5]  Verbiscer A. J. et al., 2019, Phase Curves from the Kuiper Belt: Photometric Properties of Distant Kuiper Belt Objects Observed by New Horizons, Astron. J. 158. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab3211[6]  Porter S. B. et al., 2016, The First High-phase Observations of a KBO: New Horizons Imaging of (15810) 1994 JR1 from the Kuiper Belt, ApJ Letters 828. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/828/2/L15[7]  Hasler S. N. et al., 2024, Observations of Uranus at High Phase Angle as Seen by New Horizons, The Planetary Science Journal 5, 267. doi:10.3847/PSJ/ad8cdb[8]  Corbett T. et al., 2025, Production, Transport, and Destruction of Dust in the Kuiper Belt: The Effects of Refractory and Volatile Grain Compositions, Astrophys J. 979, L50. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adab75[9]  Doner A. et al., 2024, New Horizons Venetia Burney Student Dust Counter Observes Higher than Expected Fluxes Approaching 60 AU, pp. arXiv:2401.01230.[10]  Porter S. B. et al., 2024, The Shape and Formation of Arrokoth, 55th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 3040, 2332.[11]  Knudsen I. E. et al., 2024, An Analysis of Impact Craters on Small Bodies Throughout the Solar System, The Trans-neptunian Solar System.[12]  Yoshida F. et al., 2024, A deep analysis for New Horizons' KBO search images, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 76, 720-732. doi:10.1093/pasj/psae043[13]  Fraser W. C. et al., 2024, Candidate Distant Trans-Neptunian Objects Detected by the New Horizons Subaru TNO Survey, The Planetary Science Journal 5, 227. doi:10.3847/PSJ/ad6f9e[14]  Buie M. W. et al., 2024, The New Horizons Extended Mission Target: Arrokoth Search and Discovery, The Planetary Science Journal 5, 196. doi:10.3847/PSJ/ad676d

Update to thermal inertia and albedo maps of Enceladus

Copernicus Publications (2025)

Authors:

Georgina Miles, Carly Howett, Julien Salmon

Abstract:

We present work to update current maps of the thermal properties of Enceladus using thermal observations from the Cassini Composite InfraRed Spectrometer (CIRS).  In 2010, the first maps of Enceladus’ thermal inertia were published that used what CIRS data was available at the time (Howett et al., 2010). These maps were resolved into some latitude zones, and overall conveyed lower thermal inertia and albedo at higher latitudes, and confirmed that like other cold, icy moons of Saturn its surface had low (< 50 MKS) thermal inertia.  Improvements to these maps using the totality of the CIRS Focal Plane 1 data (10-600 cm-1 / 16.7-1000 μm) from the mission with updated error estimates will yield better spatial resolution in addition to higher precision estimates of thermal inertia and albedo.   This will be particularly useful for improving models of surface temperature or estimating endogenic heat fluxes, like those at Enceladus’ south pole, associated with dissipation of heat from beneath.Acknowledgements: Thanks are given to the NASA Cassini Data Analysis program that funded this work (80NSSC20K0477 and 80NSSC24K0373). Reference:Howett, C.J.A., Spencer, J.R., Pearl, J. and Segura, M., 2010. Thermal inertia and bolometric Bond albedo values for Mimas, Enceladus, Tethys, Dione, Rhea and Iapetus as derived from Cassini/CIRS measurements. Icarus, 206(2), pp.573-593.

VIVA (Venus' Interior, Volcanism and Atmosphere): a Venus mission to reveal unknown interior structure, thermosphere dynamics and meteoroid flux from atmospheric response to seismic waves, volcanic events and external forcings

(2025)

Authors:

Raphael Garcia, Matthias Grott, Neil Bowles, Jim Cutts, Elizabeth Klioner, Marouchka Froment, Gabriella Gilli, Lauriane Soret, Apostolos Christou

Abstract:

Despite being often described as Earth’s sister planet due to a similar distance to the Sun and comparable size, Venus’s internal structure and geodynamic regime, together with its upper atmosphere dynamics and asteroid entry rates, are poorly constrained. Whereas Venus is a prime candidate for being a tectonically active planet and presents a very dynamic atmosphere, future missions will not constrain high frequency phenomena such as seismic waves, meteoroid impacts, and high frequency gravity waves. These short duration events can be used to infer Venus' seismicity, internal structure, upper atmosphere dynamics and the small Solar System bodies population [1].We present a mission concept that targets high rate observations of upper atmosphere airglow emissions on both the day and night side of Venus, as well as thermal imaging in the visible. These observations will allow us to image the propagation of acoustic waves generated by seismic waves, enabling us to investigate quake locations and magnitudes, as well as to determine the structure of the crust and upper mantle. Volcanic events will also be studied through the associated increase in surface and atmosphere temperature. In addition, variations in airglow emissions will constrain the transfer of mechanical energy from the lower atmosphere to the thermosphere, as well as atmosphere dynamics (winds) and composition, and its response to solar forcing. Finally, the observation of fireballs produced by asteroid entries will constrain the asteroid population that crosses Venus’s orbit.The instruments required to perform these high rate observations are presented. They are based on a strong heritage relying on previous implementations in planetary missions.The mission concept and spacecraft demand new capabilities in terms of on-board attitude determination and data processing capabilities. In particular, a dedicated on-board data processing unit capable of autonomously detecting different event types with advanced algorithms, including machine learning methods, has been identified as a key component of the mission. This unit will also be used to average out phenomena over different temporal and spatial scales. To maximise science return, the mission will adopt an operational concept involving the capability to download high rate event data from a first quicklook information, similar to the one implemented on InSight NASA mission.The feasibility of the mission, already partly demonstrated by VAMOS JPL/NASA mission concept study [2,3], is validated through a dedicated mission analysis study.References[1] Christou A.A., Gritsevich M. 2024. Feasibility of meteor surveying from a Venus orbiter, Icarus, 417, 15 July 2024, 116116, DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116116[2] Sutin, B.M. et al. In Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, volume 10698. SPIE, 2018. doi:10.1117/12.2309439.[3] Didion, A. et al. In 2018 IEEE aerospace conference. IEEE, 2018.

What goes on inside the Mars north polar vortex?

(2025)

Authors:

Kevin Olsen, Bethan Gregory, Franck Montmessin, Lucio Baggio, Franck Lefèvre, Oleg Korablev, Alexander Trokhimovsky, Anna Fedorova, Denis Belyaev, Juan Alday, Armin Kleinböhl

Abstract:

Mars has an axial tilt of 25.2°, comparable to that on Earth of 23.4°. This gives rise to very similar seasons, and even leads to our definition of Martian time, aligning the solar longitudes (Ls) such that Ls 0° and 180° occur at the equinoxes. In the northern hemisphere, between the equinoxes, the north polar region experiences polar days without darkness in spring and summer, and days of total darkness in the fall and winter. The dark polar winters give rise to a polar vortex that encircles the polar region and encircles an atmosphere of very cold and dry air bound within (1-3).The Atmospheric Chemistry Suite (ACS) mid-infrared channel (MIR) on the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO; 4) operates in solar occultation mode in which the Sun is used as a light source when the atmosphere lies between the Sun and TGO. The tangent point locations of ACS MIR observation necessarily lie on the solar terminator on Mars. At the poles when either polar night or polar day are experienced, there is no terminator, and solar occultations are restricted to outside such a region. The latitudinal distribution of ACS MIR solar occultations during the north polar fall and winter over four Mars years (MYs) is shown in Fig. 1. The furthest northern extent of observations occurs at the equinoxes, and falling northern boundary is seen between, as the north pole points further away from the Sun (similarly in the south, where it is polar day).While direct observations of the north polar vortex are forbidden with solar occultations, the polar vortex is not perfectly circular (1-3) and occasionally, descends into the illuminated region where we are making observations. The characteristic signs that we are sampling the polar vortex are a sudden drop in temperature below 20 km, the almost complete reduction in water vapour volume mixing ratio (VMR) and an enhancement in ozone VMR, the latter of which is extremely rare (5).To measure the extent of the polar vortex, we use temperature measurements from the Mars Climate Sounder (MCS; 6, 7) on Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO). We define the polar vortex as the average temperature over 10-20 km being within a boundary of 170 K (30). We introduce a novel technique to determine this boundary during a 1° Ls period using an alpha hull. We show that we can accurately measure the area of the polar vortex and achieve similar results to (3). The impact of the southern summer and dust activity is clearly visible in the time series of the northern polar vortex extent, leading to maxima occurring at the equinoxes, and shrinking toward perihelion. The impact of global dust storms and the late season dust storms are also pronounced.We will show the vertical structure of water vapour and ozone VMRs inside and outside the north polar vortex, the results of a search for polar vortex temperatures from the near-infrared channel (NIR) of ACS (along the dark blue dots in Fig. 1), and show whether these results agree with the polar vortex extent measurements using MCS.       Figure 1: The latitudes of ACS MIR solar occultation as a function of time (solar longitude Ls) during northern fall (Ls 180-270°) and winter (Ls 270-360°). Data from Mars years (MYs) 34-37 are indicated with colours. The region of interest in searching for polar vortex excursions is highlighted in blue.References:(1) Streeter, P. M. et al. J. Geophys. Res. 126, e2020JE006774 (2021).(2) Streeter, P. M., Lewis, S. R., Patel, M. R., Holmes, J. A., & Rajendran, K. Icarus 409, 115864 (2024).(3) Alsaeed, N.R., Hayne, P. O. & Concepcion, V. J. Geophys. Res. 129, e2024JE008397 (2024).(4) Korablev, O. et al. Space Sci. Rev. 214, 7 (2018).(5) Olsen, K. S., et al. J. Geophys. Res. 127, e2022JE007213 (2022).(6) Kleinböhl, A., et al. J. Geophys. Res., 114, E10006 (2009).(7) Kleinböhl, A., Friedson, A. J., & Schofield, J. T. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer. 187, 511-522 (2017).