The Gemini-North multiobject spectrograph integration, test and commissioning

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 4841:3 (2002) 1645-1656

Authors:

IM Hook, JR Allington-Smith, S Beard, D Crampton, R Davies, CJ Dickson, A Ebbers, M Fletcher, I J酶rgensen, I Jean, S Juneau, R Murowinski, R Nolan, K Laidlaw, B Leckie, GE Marshall, T Purkins, I Richardson, S Roberts, D Simons, M Smith, J Stilburn, K Szeto, CJ Tierney, R Wolff, R Wooff

Abstract:

The first of two Gemini Multi Object Spectrographs (GMOS) has recently begun operation at the Gemini-North 8m telescope. In this presentation we give an overview of the instrument and describe the overall performance of GMOS-North both in the laboratory during integration, and at the telescope during commissioning. We describe the development process which led to meeting the demanding reliability and performance requirements on flexure, throughput and image quality. We then show examples of GMOS data and performance on the telescope in its imaging, long-slit and MOS modes. We also briefly highlight novel features in GMOS that are described in more detail in separate presentations, particularly the flexure compensation system and the on-instrument wavefront sensor. Finally we give an update of the current status of GMOS on Gemini-North and future plans.

The Gemini-North multiobject spectrograph stability performance

Proceedings of SPIE the International Society for Optical Engineering 4841:2 (2002) 1189-1200

Authors:

R Murowinski, JR Allington-Smith, SM Beard, D Crampton, R Davies, CJ Dickson, IM Hook, I J酶rgensen, S Juneau, GE Marshall, K Szeto, CJ Tierney

Abstract:

Of the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph's (GMOS) scientific requirements, one which led to technically interesting areas was the ability to measure velocities to a accuracy of 2 km/s over the entire 5.5 arcminute square field. GMOS's design to meet this requirement includes a mechanical design for stiffness and without hysteresis or image rotation, and an open loop flexure control system which translates the detector position to compensate for flexure. The model used to predict the flexure is an empirical one developed from measured flexure results. In this paper we present the analysis of factors which enable meeting the 2 km/s requirement, and the observing strategies needed to make those observations. We look in particular detail at the development and test of that flexure compensation system, including both lab results and on-telescope results.

The Gemini-North multiobject spectrograph optical performance

Proceedings of SPIE the International Society for Optical Engineering 4841:3 (2002) 1440-1451

Authors:

R Murowinski, JR Allington-Smith, D Crampton, R Davies, M Fletcher, D Henry, IM Hook, I J酶rgensen, S Juneau, C Morbey, J Stilburn, K Szeto

Abstract:

The Gemini Multiobject Spectrographs (GMOS) were designed to take advantage of the exquisite image quality expected of the Gemini telescopes. To achieve this, two of the many requirements placed on the optical system was that it not degrade the best image quality expected of the telescope by more than 10% while delivering a throughput of about 80% over the entire 0.4-1 渭m waveband. In this paper, key components of the design and execution of this optical system are discussed and test results are presented demonstrating that it meets these requirements on Gemini today. Among other characteristics, we look at the image quality performance as a function of colour and field angle, the measured throughput, and the focalplane flatness on the detectors.

Search for radiative b hadron decays in proton anti-proton collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.8-TeV

Physical Review D 66 (2002) 112002 19pp

Authors:

JC Tseng, M Tanaka, K Ragan, F DeJongh

Measurement of B(D+-->K(*0)l(+)nu(l)).

Phys Rev Lett 89:22 (2002) 222001

Authors:

G Brandenburg, A Ershov, DY-J Kim, R Wilson, K Benslama, BI Eisenstein, J Ernst, GD Gollin, RM Hans, I Karliner, N Lowrey, MA Marsh, C Plager, C Sedlack, M Selen, JJ Thaler, J Williams, KW Edwards, R Ammar, D Besson, X Zhao, S Anderson, VV Frolov, Y Kubota, SJ Lee, SZ Li, R Poling, A Smith, CJ Stepaniak, J Urheim, S Ahmed, MS Alam, L Jian, M Saleem, F Wappler, E Eckhart, KK Gan, C Gwon, T Hart, K Honscheid, D Hufnagel, H Kagan, R Kass, TK Pedlar, JB Thayer, E Von Toerne, T Wilksen, MM Zoeller, SJ Richichi, H Severini, P Skubic, SA Dytman, S Nam, V Savinov, S Chen, JW Hinson, J Lee, DH Miller, V Pavlunin, EI Shibata, IPJ Shipsey, D Cronin-Hennessy, AL Lyon, CS Park, W Park, EH Thorndike, TE Coan, YS Gao, F Liu, Y Maravin, I Narsky, R Stroynowski, J Ye, M Artuso, C Boulahouache, K Bukin, E Dambasuren, R Mountain, T Skwarnicki, S Stone, JC Wang, AH Mahmood, SE Csorna, I Danko, Z Xu, G Bonvicini, D Cinabro, M Dubrovin, S McGee, A Bornheim, E Lipeles, SP Pappas, A Shapiro, WM Sun, AJ Weinstein, G Masek, HP Paar, R Mahapatra, RA Briere, GP Chen, T Ferguson, G Tatishvili, H Vogel, NE Adam, JP Alexander, C Bebek, K Berkelman, F Blanc, V Boisvert, DG Cassel, PS Drell, JE Duboscq, KM Ecklund, R Ehrlich, L Gibbons, B Gittelman, SW Gray, DL Hartill, BK Heltsley, L Hsu, CD Jones, J Kandaswamy, DL Kreinick, A Magerkurth, H Mahlke-Kr眉ger, TO Meyer, NB Mistry, E Nordberg, M Palmer, JR Patterson, D Peterson, J Pivarski, D Riley, AJ Sadoff, H Schwarthoff, MR Shepherd, JG Thayer, D Urner, B Valant-Spaight, G Viehhauser, A Warburton, M Weinberger, SB Athar, P Avery, H Stoeck, J Yelton, CLEO

Abstract:

Using 13.53 fb(-1) of CLEO data, we have measured the ratios of the branching fractions R(+)(e),R(+)(mu) and the combined branching fraction ratio R(+)(l), defined by R(+)(l)=[B(D+-->K(*0)l(+)nu(l))]/[B(D+-->K-pi(+)pi(+))]. We find R(+)(e)=0.74+/-0.04+/-0.05, R(+)(mu)=0.72+/-0.10+/-0.05, and R(+)(l)=0.74+/-0.04+/-0.05, where the first and second errors are statistical and systematic, respectively. The known branching fraction B(D+-->K-pi(+)pi(+)) leads to B(D+-->K(*0)e(+)nu(e))=(6.7+/-0.4+/-0.5+/-0.4)%, B(D+-->K(*0)mu(+)nu(mu))=(6.5+/-0.9+/-0.5+/-0.4)%, and B(D+-->K(*0)l(+)nu(l))=(6.7+/-0.4+/-0.5+/-0.4)%, where the third error is due to the uncertainty in B(D+-->K-pi(+)pi(+)).