Single-star optical turbulence profiling techniques for SHIMM and other Shack–Hartmann instruments

Applied Optics Optica Publishing Group 65:19 (2026) H63-H63

Authors:

Ryan Griffiths, Timothy Butterley, Richard Wilson, James Osborn

Abstract:

<jats:p> Atmospheric optical turbulence (OT) monitoring is crucial for site characterization at astronomical observatories and optical communications ground stations. The Shack–Hartmann image motion monitor (SHIMM) instrument implements a fast, infrared Shack–Hartmann sensor to measure a low-resolution OT profile continuously throughout the day and night. This work presents advances made in Shack–Hartman optical turbulence profiling techniques implemented on the SHIMM, including a derivation and validation of Z-tilt weighting functions, implementation of methods for correcting for non-zero exposure times, and for estimating the coherence time of optical turbulence using the profile coupled with the fast defocus method. These techniques were tested via end-to-end Monte Carlo simulations of the SHIMM instrument using real turbulence profiles from the Paranal stereo-SCIDAR instrument with an augmented ground layer. All measurements of integrated OT parameters were in strong agreement with the simulation inputs, evidenced by correlation coefficients close to one, small RMS error, and bias. The accuracy of the four-layer SHIMM model was also investigated, which showed high correlation with simulation inputs for all layers even in daytime OT conditions. This study suggests that, for the turbulence database used, and under realistic daytime noise conditions, a <jats:italic>C</jats:italic> <jats:sub> <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> </jats:sub> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> ( <jats:italic>h</jats:italic> )d <jats:italic>h</jats:italic> sensitivity limit in the region of 2×10 <jats:sup>−15</jats:sup> m <jats:sup>1/3</jats:sup> was encountered in the highest altitude layer. There was also evidence of a cross-talk effect between the strong ground layer and the first atmospheric layer. </jats:p>

Upper limits on exosatellites around $β$ Pictoris b

(2026)

Authors:

MA Kenworthy, R Landman, A Vanderburg, JE Rodriguez, JL Birkby, I Macias, D González Picos, SA Jenkins, E Kleisioti, T Stolker, I Koutalios

The CRIMSON survey I: super-stellar SiO in the directly imaged companion TWA 5 B from high-resolution M-band spectroscopy

(2026)

Authors:

Luke T Parker, Jayne L Birkby, Siddharth Gandhi, Vivien Parmentier, Vatsal Panwar, Matteo Brogi, Sophia R Vaughan

Supermassive black holes in six triaxial galaxies: Insights from SINFONI and MUSE observations

(2026)

Authors:

Sabine Thater, Avinash Chaturvedi, Davor Krajnovic, Michele Cappellari, Sadegh Khochfar, Thorsten Naab, Marc Sarzi, Glenn van de Ven

The Supermassive Black Hole in the Nearby Spiral Galaxy M81: A Robust Mass from JWST/NIRSpec Stellar Dynamics

The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 1003:1 (2026) 98

Authors:

Dieu D Nguyen, Tuan N Le, Michele Cappellari, Hai N Ngo, Tinh QT Le, Tien HT Ho, Long QT Nguyen, Elena Gallo, Fan Zou, Michele Perna, Niranjan Thatte, Miguel Pereira-Santaella

Abstract:

Despite its proximity, the mass of the supermassive black hole (SMBH) in the spiral galaxy M81 (NGC 3031) has remained a subject of discussion, with doubts previously cast on the reliability of available dynamical measurements. We present the first robust stellar-dynamics measurement of its mass using high-resolution, two-dimensional kinematics from JWST/NIRSpec observations of the central 3″ × 3″. By tracing stellar motions in the near-infrared, our data penetrate the obscuring nuclear dust and allow for the separation of stellar light from the nonthermal AGN continuum. We modeled the kinematics using the Jeans anisotropic modelling method. Rather than relying on a standard Bayesian approach for error estimation, we constructed a suite of 24 independent models, each employing a unique combination of different physical assumptions regarding stellar mass-to-light (M/L) ratio gradients, the point-spread function, the masking of the central active galactic nucleus, and the orientation of the velocity ellipsoid. This ensemble approach allows us to robustly account for the impact of systematic uncertainties. To estimate our systematic uncertainties, we performed a bootstrap of the MBH values derived from these 24 models, thereby incorporating the variance between different physical assumptions. Our analysis yields a precise SMBH mass of MBH = (4.77 ± 0.37) × 107 M⊙ (1σ confidence, including systematic and statistical uncertainties). This result is consistent with previous determinations within their uncertainties, while providing a crucial and highly reliable anchor point for SMBH–galaxy scaling relations in spiral galaxies.