Water observed in the atmosphere of {\tau} Bootis Ab with CARMENES/CAHA

(2022)

Authors:

Rebecca K Webb, Siddharth Gandhi, Matteo Brogi, Jayne L Birkby, Ernst de Mooij, Ignas Snellen, Yapeng Zhang

Patchy nightside clouds on ultra-hot Jupiters: General Circulation Model simulations with radiatively active cloud tracers

(2022)

Authors:

Thaddeus D Komacek, Xianyu Tan, Peter Gao, Elspeth KH Lee

Plant power: Burning biomass instead of coal can help fight climate change—but only if done right

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Taylor & Francis 78:3 (2022) 125-127

Uranus and Neptune’s stratospheric water abundance and vertical profile from Herschel-HIFI

Planetary Science Journal IOP Publishing 3:4 (2022) 96

Authors:

Nicholas Teanby, Patrick Irwin, Melodie Sylvestre, Conor Nixon, Martin Cordiner

Abstract:

Here we present new constraints on Uranus’s and Neptune’s externally sourced stratospheric water abundance using disk-averaged observations of the 557 GHz emission line from Herschel’s Heterodyne Instrument for the Far-Infrared. Derived stratospheric column water abundances are × 1014 cm−2 for Uranus and ×1014 cm−2 for Neptune, consistent with previous determinations using ISO-SWS and Herschel-PACS. For Uranus, excellent observational fits are obtained by scaling photochemical model profiles or with step-type profiles with water vapor limited to ≤0.6 mbar. However, Uranus’s cold stratospheric temperatures imply a ∼0.03 mbar condensation level, which further limits water vapor to pressures ≤0.03 mbar. Neptune’s warmer stratosphere has a deeper ∼1 mbar condensation level, so emission-line pressure broadening can be used to further constrain the water profile. For Neptune, excellent fits are obtained using step-type profiles with cutoffs of ∼0.3–0.6 mbar or by scaling a photochemical model profile. Step-type profiles with cutoffs ≥1.0 mbar or ≤0.1 mbar can be rejected with 4σ significance. Rescaling photochemical model profiles from Moses & Poppe to match our observed column abundances implies similar external water fluxes for both planets: × 104 cm−2 s−1 for Uranus and ×104 cm−2 s−1 for Neptune. This suggests that Neptune’s ∼4 times greater observed water column abundance is primarily caused by its warmer stratosphere preventing loss by condensation, rather than by a significantly more intense external source. To reconcile these water fluxes with other stratospheric oxygen species (CO and CO2) requires either a significant CO component in interplanetary dust particles (Uranus) or contributions from cometary impacts (Uranus, Neptune)

Cloud-convection Feedback in Brown Dwarf Atmospheres

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL 929:2 (2022) ARTN 153

Authors:

Maxence Lefevre, Xianyu Tan, Elspeth KH Lee, RT Pierrehumbert