Applications of 1.4 GHz diagnostics to Type Ia Supernova host galaxies
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 549:1 (2026) stag832
Abstract:
Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) standardization parameters exhibit evidence for systematic variation across the host galaxy star formation rate–stellar mass (SFR) plane, motivating the incorporation of galaxy SFR information in cosmological inference. SFRs are commonly estimated via spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting with far-infrared (FIR) measurements to account for dust-obscured star formation. Such FIR coverage will, however, be limited for upcoming time-domain surveys such as the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), necessitating the use of alternative SFR tracers. Here, we reconstruct the SFR– plane using 1.4 GHz diagnostics, to test the consistency of host classifications against FIR-constrained SED-based estimates. Within this plane, SN Ia host galaxies are divided into three regions: Region 1 (low mass), Region 2 (high-mass star forming), and Region 3 (high-mass passive). We find that per cent of SN hosts retain identical region assignments when using radio versus FIR-constrained SED-derived SFRs. Measuring SN Ia nuisance parameters () within each subregion, we find consistent values between the two SFR– plane reconstructions, indicating limited sensitivity to SFR estimator choice, with the largest deviations in Region 3 at . Across the three 1.4 GHz SFR– subregions, we confirm the region-dependent variation in SN Ia standardization parameters – particularly – reported in our earlier SED-based analysis. With near-complete radio coverage of the LSST footprint anticipated from current and forthcoming radio continuum surveys (e.g. Square Kilometre Array), radio SFR calibrations will become an increasingly useful and scalable approach to host galaxy classification, supporting the construction of robust SN Ia subsamples for precision cosmology.Euclid: A blue galaxy population and a brightest cluster galaxy in the making in a z ∼ 1.74 MaDCoWS2 galaxy cluster candidate
Astronomy and Astrophysics 709 (2026)
Abstract:
We present an example cluster follow-up study with Euclid. Our target, a z ∼ 1.74 candidate cluster nicknamed the ‘Puddle’, was initially discovered by the Massive and Distant Clusters of WISE Survey 2 as a zEuclid: Improving redshift distribution reconstruction using a deep-to-wide transfer function
Astronomy and Astrophysics 709 (2026)
Abstract:
The Euclid mission of the European Space Agency seeks to understand the Universe’s expansion history and the nature of dark energy, through measurements of cosmic shear. This requires a very accurate estimate of the true redshift distribution of the galaxies, with the systematic error in the mean redshift satisfying σEuclid: Modelling observational effects in cluster counts and cluster clustering
Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 709 (2026) a102
Abstract:
This study explores the impact of observational and modelling systematic effects on cluster number counts and cluster clustering and provides model prescriptions for their joint analysis in the context of the Euclid survey. Using 1000 Euclid -like cluster catalogues, we investigated the effect of systematic uncertainties on cluster summary statistics and their auto- and cross-covariance, and performed a likelihood analysis to evaluate their impact on cosmological constraints, with a focus on the matter density parameter (Ω m ) and on the power spectrum amplitude ( σ 8 ). Combining cluster clustering with number counts significantly improves cosmological constraints, with the figure of merit increasing by over 300% compared to number counts alone. We confirm that the two probes are uncorrelated, and the cosmological constraints derived from their combination are almost insensitive to the cosmology dependence of the covariance. We find that photometric redshift uncertainties broaden cosmological posteriors by 20–30%, while secondary effects such as redshift-space distortions (RSDs) have a smaller impact on the posteriors – 5% for clustering alone, 10% when combining probes – but can significantly bias the constraints if neglected. We show that clustering data below 60 h −1 Mpc provides additional constraining power, while scales larger than the acoustic oscillation scale add almost no information on Ω m and σ 8 parameters. The RSDs and photo- z uncertainties also influence the number count covariance, with a significant impact of about 15–20% on the parameter constraints.Mature but Still Growing: JWST Detection of the Earliest Intracluster Light at z ∼ 2
The Astrophysical Journal Letters American Astronomical Society 1002:1 (2026) L17