The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM, version 2: sensitivity to improvements in process representations

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 12:19 (2012) 8911-8949

Authors:

K Zhang, D O'Donnell, J Kazil, P Stier, S Kinne, U Lohmann, S Ferrachat, B Croft, J Quaas, H Wan, S Rast, J Feichter

The present-day decadal solar cycle modulation of Earth's radiative forcing via charged H2SO4/H2O aerosol nucleation

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS 39 (2012) ARTN L02805

Authors:

J Kazil, K Zhang, P Stier, J Feichter, U Lohmann, K O'Brien

The effect of extratropical cyclones on satellite-retrieved aerosol properties over ocean

Geophysical Research Letters 38:13 (2011)

Authors:

BS Grandey, P Stier, TM Wagner, RG Grainger, KI Hodges

Abstract:

Extratropical cyclones may have a significant effect on column aerosol properties over ocean. European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) derived storm-centric composites of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) aerosol optical depth and aerosol size parameters are produced for the North Atlantic and the South Atlantic oceans. It is found that retrieved aerosol optical depth and aerosol size both increase near the center of the composite extratropical cyclones. Using composites of ECMWF ERA-Interim reanalysis data, it is demonstrated that wind speed is a considerably more likely explanatory variable than relative humidity for the aerosol observations. A comparison of composites for both MODIS and AATSR, which uses a wind speed dependent sea-surface brightness model in the aerosol retrieval, suggests that although surface brightness effects may contribute towards some of the observations, wind speed dependent emission of sea salt also appears to make a significant contribution to the observed aerosol properties. 漏 2011 by the American Geophysical Union.

Induced Delocalization by Correlation and Interaction in the one-dimensional Anderson Model

ArXiv 1103.2116 (2011)

Authors:

Conrad Albrecht, Sandro Wimberger

Global dust model intercomparison in AeroCom phase i

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 11:15 (2011) 7781-7816

Authors:

N Huneeus, M Schulz, Y Balkanski, J Griesfeller, J Prospero, S Kinne, S Bauer, O Boucher, M Chin, F Dentener, T Diehl, R Easter, D Fillmore, S Ghan, P Ginoux, A Grini, L Horowitz, D Koch, MC Krol, W Landing, X Liu, N Mahowald, R Miller, JJ Morcrette, G Myhre, J Penner, J Perlwitz, P Stier, T Takemura, CS Zender

Abstract:

This study presents the results of a broad intercomparison of a total of 15 global aerosol models within the AeroCom project. Each model is compared to observations related to desert dust aerosols, their direct radiative effect, and their impact on the biogeochemical cycle, i.e., aerosol optical depth (AOD) and dust deposition. Additional comparisons to Angstr脙露m exponent (AE), coarse mode AOD and dust surface concentrations are included to extend the assessment of model performance and to identify common biases present in models. These data comprise a benchmark dataset that is proposed for model inspection and future dust model development. There are large differences among the global models that simulate the dust cycle and its impact on climate. In general, models simulate the climatology of vertically integrated parameters (AOD and AE) within a factor of two whereas the total deposition and surface concentration are reproduced within a factor of 10. In addition, smaller mean normalized bias and root mean square errors are obtained for the climatology of AOD and AE than for total deposition and surface concentration. Characteristics of the datasets used and their uncertainties may influence these differences. Large uncertainties still exist with respect to the deposition fluxes in the southern oceans. Further measurements and model studies are necessary to assess the general model performance to reproduce dust deposition in ocean regions sensible to iron contributions. Models overestimate the wet deposition in regions dominated by dry deposition. They generally simulate more realistic surface concentration at stations downwind of the main sources than at remote ones. Most models simulate the gradient in AOD and AE between the different dusty regions. However the seasonality and magnitude of both variables is better simulated at African stations than Middle East ones. The models simulate the offshore transport of West Africa throughout the year but they overestimate the AOD and they transport too fine particles. The models also reproduce the dust transport across the Atlantic in the summer in terms of both AOD and AE but not so well in winter-spring nor the southward displacement of the dust cloud that is responsible of the dust transport into South America. Based on the dependency of AOD on aerosol burden and size distribution we use model bias with respect to AOD and AE to infer the bias of the dust emissions in Africa and the Middle East. According to this analysis we suggest that a range of possible emissions for North Africa is 400 to 2200 Tg yr-1 and in the Middle East 26 to 526 Tg yr-1. 漏 2011 Author(s).