CODEX weak lensing mass catalogue and implications on the mass-richness relation

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 502:1 (2020) 1494-1526

Authors:

K Kiiveri, D Gruen, A Finoguenov, T Erben, L Van Waerbeke, E Rykoff, L Miller, S Hagstotz, R Dupke, JP Henry, JP Kneib, G Gozaliasl, CC Kirkpatrick, N Cibirka, N Clerc, M Costanzi, ES Cypriano, E Rozo, H Shan, P Spinelli, J Valiviita, J Weller

Abstract:

The COnstrain Dark Energy with X-ray clusters (CODEX) sample contains the largest flux limited sample of X-ray clusters at 0.35 < z < 0.65. It was selected from ROSAT data in the 10 000 square degrees of overlap with BOSS, mapping a total number of 2770 high-z galaxy clusters. We present here the full results of the CFHT CODEX programme on cluster mass measurement, including a reanalysis of CFHTLS Wide data, with 25 individual lensing-constrained cluster masses. We employ lensfit shape measurement and perform a conservative colour-space selection and weighting of background galaxies. Using the combination of shape noise and an analytic covariance for intrinsic variations of cluster profiles at fixed mass due to large-scale structure, miscentring, and variations in concentration and ellipticity, we determine the likelihood of the observed shear signal as a function of true mass for each cluster. We combine 25 individual cluster mass likelihoods in a Bayesian hierarchical scheme with the inclusion of optical and X-ray selection functions to derive constraints on the slope 伪, normalization 尾, and scatter 蟽ln位|渭 of our richness-mass scaling relation model in log-space: 銆圛n 位|渭銆� = 伪渭 + 尾, with 渭 = ln (M200c/Mpiv), and Mpiv = 1014.81M鈯�. We find a slope 伪 = 0.49+0.20-0.15, normalization (尾) = 84.0+9.2-14.8, and 蟽ln 位|渭 = 0.17+0.13-0.09 using CFHT richness estimates. In comparison to other weak lensing richness-mass relations, we find the normalization of the richness statistically agreeing with the normalization of other scaling relations from a broad redshift range (0.0 < z < 0.65) and with different cluster selection (X-ray, Sunyaev-Zeldovich, and optical).

The role of AGN on the structure, kinematics and evolution of ETGs in the Horizon simulations

(2020)

Authors:

MS Rosito, SE Pedrosa, PB Tissera, NE Chisari, R Dominguez-Tenreiro, Y Dubois, S Peirani, J Devriendt, C Pichon, A Slyz

A fast semi-discrete optimal transport algorithm for a unique reconstruction of the early Universe

(2020)

Authors:

Bruno L茅vy, Roya Mohayaee, Sebastian VON HAUSEGGER

MIGHTEE: are giant radio galaxies more common than we thought?

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 501:3 (2020) 3833-3845

Authors:

J Delhaize, Ian Heywood, M Prescott, Matthew Jarvis, I Delvecchio, Ih Whittam, Sv White, Mj Hardcastle, Cl Hale, J Afonso, Y Ao, M Brienza, M Br眉ggen, Jd Collier, E Daddi, M Glowacki, N Maddox, Lk Morabito, I Prandoni, Z Randriamanakoto, S Sekhar, F An, Nj Adams, S Blyth, Rebecca Bowler, L Leeuw, L Marchetti, Sm Randriamampandry, K Thorat, N Seymour, O Smirnov, Ar Taylor, C Tasse, M Vaccari

Abstract:

We report the discovery of two new giant radio galaxies (GRGs) using the MeerKAT International GHz Tiered Extragalactic Exploration (MIGHTEE) survey. Both GRGs were found within a 鈭�1鈥塪eg2 region inside the COSMOS field. They have redshifts of z = 0.1656 and z = 0.3363 and physical sizes of 2.4 and 2.0 Mpc, respectively. Only the cores of these GRGs were clearly visible in previous high-resolution Very Large Array observations, since the diffuse emission of the lobes was resolved out. However, the excellent sensitivity and uv coverage of the new MeerKAT telescope allowed this diffuse emission to be detected. The GRGs occupy an unpopulated region of radio power 鈥� size parameter space. Based on a recent estimate of the GRG number density, the probability of finding two or more GRGs with such large sizes at z < 0.4 in a 鈭�1鈥塪eg2 field is only 2.7 脳 10鈭�6, assuming Poisson statistics. This supports the hypothesis that the prevalence of GRGs has been significantly underestimated in the past due to limited sensitivity to low surface brightness emission. The two GRGs presented here may be the first of a new population to be revealed through surveys like MIGHTEE that provide exquisite sensitivity to diffuse, extended emission.

Calibration of QUBIC: The Q and U bolometric interferometer for cosmology

SPIE, the international society for optics and photonics (2020) 174

Authors:

James Murphy, D Burke, MM Gamboa Lerena, Jean-Christophe Hamilton, L Mousset, M De Petris, C O'Sullivan, S Torchinsky, Peter AR Ade, JG Alberro, A Almela, G Amico, LH Arnaldi, D Auguste, J Aumont, S Azzoni, S Banfi, B B茅lier, ES Battistelli, A Ba霉, D Bennett, L Berg茅, P de Bernardis, JP Bernard, M Bersanelli, MA Bigot-Sazy, J Bonaparte, J Bonis, E Bunn, D Buzi, F Cavaliere, P Chanial, C Chapron, R Charlassier, AC Cobos Cerutti, F Columbro, A Coppolecchia, G D'Alessandro, G De Gasperis, M De Leo, St茅phane Dheilly, C Duca, L Dumoulin, A Etchegoyen, A Fasciszewski, LP Ferreyro, D Fracchia, Cristian Franceschet, Kenneth Ganga, B Garc铆a, ME Garc铆a Redondo, M Gaspard, D Gayer, M Gervasi, M Giard, V Gilles, Y Giraud-Heraud, Laurent Grandsire, M G贸mez Berisso, M Gonz谩lez, Marcin Gradziel, MR Hampel, D Harari, S Henrot-Versill茅, F Incardona, E Jules, J Kaplan, C Kristukat, L Lamagna, S Loucatos, T Louis, B Maffei, S Marnieros, W Marty, A Mattei, A May, M McCulloch, L Mele, S Masi, D Melo, A Mennella, L Montier, LM Mundo, JA Murphy, F Nati, E Olivieri, Christine Oriol, A Paiella, F Pajot, A Passerini, H Pastoriza, A Pelosi, C Perbost, M Perciballi, F Pezzotta, F Piacentini, M Piat, L Piccirillo, G Pisano, M Platino, G Polenta, D Pr锚le, R Puddu, D Rambaud, E Rasztocky, P Ringegni, GE Romero, JM Salum, C Sc贸ccola, A Schillaci, S Scully, S Spinelli, Guillaume Stankowiak, M Stolpovskiy, AD Supanitsky, A Tartari, JP Thermeau, P Timbie, M Tomasi, G Tucker, Carole Tucker, D Vigan貌, N Vittorio, F Voisin, F Wicek, M Wright, M Zannoni, A Zullo