51ÁÔÆæÈë¿Ú

Skip to main content
Department Of Physics text logo
  • Research
    • Our research
    • Our research groups
    • Our research in action
    • Research funding support
    • Summer internships for undergraduates
  • 51ÁÔÆæÈë¿Ú
    • Undergraduates
    • Postgraduates
  • Engage
    • For young people
    • For teachers
    • For the public
    • For alumni
    • For business
  • Support
Menu
von Kármán vortex street over Canary Islands
Credit: NASA

Philip Stier

Professor of Atmospheric Physics

Research theme

  • Climate physics

Sub department

  • Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics

Research groups

  • Climate processes
philip.stier@physics.ox.ac.uk
Telephone: 01865 (2)72887
Atmospheric Physics Clarendon Laboratory, room 103
  • About
  • Research
  • Teaching
  • CV
  • Publications

Influences of in-cloud aerosol scavenging parameterizations on aerosol concentrations and wet deposition in ECHAM5-HAM

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 10:4 (2010) 1511-1543

Authors:

B Croft, U Lohmann, RV Martin, P Stier, S Wurzler, J Feichter, C Hoose, U Heikkila, A van Donkelaar, S Ferrachat

Interpreting the cloud cover - aerosol optical depth relationship found in satellite data using a general circulation model

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 10:13 (2010) 6129-6135

Authors:

J Quaas, B Stevens, P Stier, U Lohmann

Sources of uncertainties in modelling black carbon at the global scale

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 10:6 (2010) 2595-2611

Authors:

E Vignati, M Karl, M Krol, J Wilson, P Stier, F Cavalli

Aerosol indirect effects �€" general circulation model intercomparison and evaluation with satellite data

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 9:22 (2009) 8697-8717

Authors:

J Quaas, Y Ming, S Menon, T Takemura, M Wang, JE Penner, A Gettelman, U Lohmann, N Bellouin, O Boucher, AM Sayer, GE Thomas, A McComiskey, G Feingold, C Hoose, JE Kristj�nsson, X Liu, Y Balkanski, LJ Donner, PA Ginoux, P Stier, B Grandey, J Feichter, I Sednev, SE Bauer, D Koch, RG Grainger, A Kirkevaring, T Iversen, O Seland, R Easter, SJ Ghan, PJ Rasch, H Morrison, JF Lamarque, MJ Iacono, S Kinne, M Schulz

Abstract:

Aerosol indirect effects continue to constitute one of the most important uncertainties for anthropogenic climate perturbations. Within the international AEROCOM initiative, the representation of aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions in ten different general circulation models (GCMs) is evaluated using three satellite datasets. The focus is on stratiform liquid water clouds since most GCMs do not include ice nucleation effects, and none of the model explicitly parameterises aerosol effects on convective clouds. We compute statistical relationships between aerosol optical depth (τ a) and various cloud and radiation quantities in a manner that is consistent between the models and the satellite data. It is found that the model-simulated influence of aerosols on cloud droplet number concentration (Nd) compares relatively well to the satellite data at least over the ocean. The relationship between τa and liquid water path is simulated much too strongly by the models. This suggests that the implementation of the second aerosol indirect effect mainly in terms of an autoconversion parameterisation has to be revisited in the GCMs. A positive relationship between total cloud fraction (fcld) and τ a as found in the satellite data is simulated by the majority of the models, albeit less strongly than that in the satellite data in most of them. In a discussion of the hypotheses proposed in the literature to explain the satellite-derived strongfcldÄ�€"&³Ù²¹³Ü;a relationship, our results indicate that none can be identified as a unique explanation. Relationships similar to the ones found in satellite data between τa and cloud top temperature or outgoing long-wave radiation (OLR) are simulated by only a few GCMs. The GCMs that simulate a negative OLRÄ�€"&³Ù²¹³Ü; a relationship show a strong positive correlation between τa andfcld. The short-wave total aerosol radiative forcing as simulated by the GCMs is strongly influenced by the simulated anthropogenic fraction of τa, and parameterisation assumptions such as a lower bound onNd. Nevertheless, the strengths of the statistical relationships are good predictors for the aerosol forcings in the models. An estimate of the total short-wave aerosol forcing inferred from the combination of these predictors for the modelled forcings with the satellite-derived statistical relationships yields a global annual mean value of −1.5±0.5 Wm−2. In an alternative approach, the radiative flux perturbation due to anthropogenic aerosols can be broken down into a component over the cloud-free portion of the globe (approximately the aerosol direct effect) and a component over the cloudy portion of the globe (approximately the aerosol indirect effect). An estimate obtained by scaling these simulated clear- and cloudy-sky forcings with estimates of anthropogenic τa and satellite-retrievedNdÄ�€"&³Ù²¹³Ü;a regression slopes, respectively, yields a global, annual-mean aerosol direct effect estimate of −0.4±0.2 Wm−2 and a cloudy-sky (aerosol indirect effect) estimate of −0.7±0.5 Wm−2, with a total estimate of −1.2±0. 4 Wm−2.

Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 9:22 (2009) 9001-9026

Authors:

D Koch, M Schulz, S Kinne, C McNaughton, JR Spackman, Y Balkanski, S Bauer, T Berntsen, TC Bond, O Boucher, M Chin, A Clarke, N De Luca, F Dentener, T Diehl, O Dubovik, R Easter, DW Fahey, J Feichter, D Fillmore, S Freitag, S Ghan, P Ginoux, S Gong, L Horowitz, T Iversen, A Kirkevåg, Z Klimont, Y Kondo, M Krol, X Liu, R Miller, V Montanaro, N Moteki, G Myhre, JE Penner, J Perlwitz, G Pitari, S Reddy, L Sahu, H Sakamoto, G Schuster, JP Schwarz, Seland, P Stier, N Takegawa, T Takemura, C Textor, JA Van Aardenne, Y Zhao

Abstract:

We evaluate black carbon (BC) model predictions from the AeroCom model intercomparison project by considering the diversity among year 2000 model simulations and comparing model predictions with available measurements. These model-measurement intercomparisons include BC surface and aircraft concentrations, aerosol absorption optical depth (AAOD) retrievals from AERONET and Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) and BC column estimations based on AERONET. In regions other than Asia, most models are biased high compared to surface concentration measurements. However compared with (column) AAOD or BC burden retreivals, the models are generally biased low. The average ratio of model to retrieved AAOD is less than 0.7 in South American and 0.6 in African biomass burning regions; both of these regions lack surface concentration measurements. In Asia the average model to observed ratio is 0.7 for AAOD and 0.5 for BC surface concentrations. Compared with aircraft measurements over the Americas at latitudes between 0 and 50N, the average model is a factor of 8 larger than observed, and most models exceed the measured BC standard deviation in the mid to upper troposphere. At higher latitudes the average model to aircraft BC ratio is 0.4 and models underestimate the observed BC loading in the lower and middle troposphere associated with springtime Arctic haze. Low model bias for AAOD but overestimation of surface and upper atmospheric BC concentrations at lower latitudes suggests that most models are underestimating BC absorption and should improve estimates for refractive index, particle size, and optical effects of BC coating. Retrieval uncertainties and/or differences with model diagnostic treatment may also contribute to the model-measurement disparity. Largest AeroCom model diversity occurred in northern Eurasia and the remote Arctic, regions influenced by anthropogenic sources. Changing emissions, aging, removal, or optical properties within a single model generated a smaller change in model predictions than the range represented by the full set of AeroCom models. Upper tropospheric concentrations of BC mass from the aircraft measurements are suggested to provide a unique new benchmark to test scavenging and vertical dispersion of BC in global models.

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page Prev
  • …
  • Page 60
  • Page 61
  • Page 62
  • Page 63
  • Current page 64
  • Page 65
  • Page 66
  • Page 67
  • Page 68
  • …
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Footer Menu

  • Contact us
  • Giving to the Dept of Physics
  • Work with us
  • Media

User account menu

  • Log in

Follow us

FIND US

Clarendon Laboratory,

Parks Road,

Oxford,

OX1 3PU

CONTACT US

Tel: +44(0)1865272200

Department Of Physics text logo

© University of Oxford - Department of Physics

Cookies | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement

  • Home
  • Research
  • 51ÁÔÆæÈë¿Ú
  • Engage
  • Our people
  • News & Comment
  • Events
  • Our facilities & services
  • 51ÁÔÆæÈë¿Ú
  • Giving to Physics